Great man and theory of leadership

Great opus and supposition of leadershiphipThe main idea behind Great troops theory is that leaders can non be made, for they are born leaders (Great soldiery Theory, Assumptions, n.d.). The supporters of the great man theory concentrated mainly on intumesce known diachronic political and military leaders (Leadership Theories, The Great world Theory, 1). They too claimed that unexpected hithertots, like for eccentric war, can also fare sudden rise of the leader, among which one could list Napoleon Bonaparte, George Washington, or even Adolf Hitler, who managed to gain support of the majority of the population. But even centuries earlier, humankind witnessed historical events used to support the concept of the great leader theory, like for instance Moses (Great Man Theory, Description, n.d), who was seen as the only one capable of freeing Israelites.The leaders, who course into the group of the great man, were perceived not only as exalted alone also mythic, possessing specific traits (Leadership Theories, The Great Man Theory, 2). On the some other hand, because pot posses different traits, it was im realistic for the great man theory supporters to record an universal model of the great man, characterized by common values and the comparable number of traits. Nevertheless, those who support Trait Theory believe that a trim of universal traits of leaders can be established (Leadership Theories, Trait Theory, 4), and population who make good leaders have the right or competent combination of traits (Trait Leadership Theory, 12Manage, Assumptions of Trait Theory, 3). Basically, if one can identify people to have the certain traits, the traits falling into the Trait Theory boundary, then leaders can be easily identified (Shead, 1).Clawthon (1996, 5) writes that fate or scrimping was a major determinant of the course of history, the contention that leaders are born, not made was widely accepted, not only by scholars, but by those attempting to influence the behavior of others. According to him, the Great Man theory has been abounded due to the increased interest in the behavioral sciences, and to the claim that if not everyone, then many, can be trained to become leaders by means of enhancing their abilities, for nurture is far more important than nature in ascertain who becomes a successful leader (1996, 6). One could say that one of the curtilage behind abounding The Great Man and Trait Theory was also the fact that instead to concentrate on effective leadership it looked into what possible could make a great leader. It fully focused on leader, omitting the splendour of the followers (Leadership Theories, Weaknesses, 1 ), who might look for a certain traits in their leaders and abound them if failed to find. Among those desired traits are honesty, inspiration, forward-looking, competency, and intelligence (Shead, 6).