The Shift in Abortion Policy in the 1800s Essay -- History Abortion Fe

The Shift in Abortion Policy in the 1800sIn 1800 no jurisdiction in the unify Sates had enacted any statutes whatsoever on the battlefield of abortion... Yet by 1900 virtually every jurisdiction in the United States had laws upon its books that proscribed the practice sharply and declared most abortions to be bend offenses (Mohr p. VII).Societal Changes from the Early 1800s to the Mid 1800sDuring the early 1800s, abortion at the source of a pregnancy was neither immoral nor criminal. Common law held that in advance quickening, the first perception of fetal movement by the mother, usually during the atomic number 42 trimester, the fetus was not alive or independent. After quickening abortion was a criminal offense, because the fetus had demonstrated the beginnings of independent life (Mohr p. 1). Since the designate of quickening varied from woman to woman and depended upon her word, it was near impossible to occupy criminal abortions (Mohr p. 2). Most of the laws of the earl y 1800s were aimed not at prosecuting women for obtaining an abortion, but rather to protect them from medical malpractice such as poisoning, physical harm, and unwanted abortions (Mohr p. 21, 28) (see mollie smith case link).Information on abortion was procurable to women in the main through home medical manuals and journals. Abortion information was usually available in two sections of home medical books how to ?release obstructed flowing? and ?dangers? to avoid during pregnancy. The latter section was a sort of how-to in regress that could be effectively put to use by the reader. The most widely consulted work, Buchans Domestic Medicine, advised emetics and a mixture of prepared steel, powdered myrrh, and aloe to ? animate menstrual flow.? Under caus... ...tives, sixth ed. Worth Publishers. 2001 Mohr, James C. Abortion in America The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, 1800-1900. Oxford University Press novel York, New York. 1978. New York Times, Aug 23 1871, Aug 27 1871, Aug 30 1871, Aug 31 1871, Oct 29 1871.Shryock, R. H. Medicine and participation in America 1660-1860. Ithaca, NY Cornell. 1960Starr, P. Medicine, Economy and Society in Nineteenth cytosine America, Journal of Social news report. 1977. pp10, 588-607.Taverne, Dick. The Huge Benefits of GM are being block off by Blind Opposition, The Guardian 3 Mar. 2004 24.Wertz, R., and Wertz D. Lying-In A History of Childbirth in America. New York Free Press. 1997Wilson, Richard K. DNA 50 historic period Later, St. Louis Post 27 Feb. 2003 B7.Zeitz, Joshua M. The Big Lie about the Little Pill, get hold of NAME OF PAPER OR JOURNAL27 Dec. 2004 A17.