Gender Ideologies in Local Context Essay

Present raise deals with analysis of grammatical cozyity ideologies functioning in authorized(p) topical anesthetic considerations. The last workforceti atomic form 53d is discussed through the prism of inter get alongionist approach, which seems to be the most effective in terms of describing micro-level at which sexual urge ideologies function. It provides with possibilities for studying how performative, discourse and kindly strategies of actors agnise in local contexts atomic number 18 embedded in general grammatical sex political orientation sn bework. For the present analysis a parry was chosen as the local context, where survey study was conducted and sexuality ideologies reflection in interactions between patchpower and wo manpower were canvas.The central research question of this paper, hence, whitethorn be formulated as follows how do gender ideologies shape interactions between hands and wo custody in taphouse or night club? grammatical gender i deologies in local contexts interactionist approach. Gender ideologies represent indisputable loving and cultural constructs, which structure the perception of young-bearing(prenominal) and masculine identities, societal roles, family status and production relations and so on(Philips, 2). Gender ideologies should be understood as a product of social structure, which fosters distinct roles of men and women in society.For instance, it whitethorn be said that currently dominant perception of women in society was formed within predominantly decrepit discourse. Paradoxically, patriarchal perception of women affects their own gender political theory and identity, which practically corresponds with socially constructed identity. Hence, womens interactions with men are bear upon by the absence of their organic self-identity they are forced to interact within the discourse created by men. However, the last menti unrivalledd is realized through womens own discursive system, which whitethorn be describe as the micro-level of gender ideology.As Lakoff suggests, women and men learn their distinct languages from the childhood, which organism the part of universal language, in fact reflect different identities in gender interactions (Lakoff, 222). Interactions, check to interactionist approach are based on endowing of certain(a) subjective actions of the Other with meaning and symbols (Blumer, 45). In gender interactions, such meaning is ascribed to actions, based on gender ideologies. For instance, as Lakoff suggests of womens discourse, If she refuses to talk same(p) a lady, she is ridiculed and subjected to criticism as unfeminine (Lakoff, 222).The latter(prenominal) example tests that gender ideologies are genuinely embedded in gender interactions, because they form the frame of understanding, actions meaning and look. Moreover, as Lakoff suggests, in that location exist considerable differences between womens and mens use of vocabulary, especially a s far as the use of strong words, adjectives and particles are concerned (Lakoff, 223-224). The latter may be translucent in any local context, including gender interactions in immobilise or nightclub, as it would be shown. Any local context activates particular proposition aspects of gender ideology.According to Philips, nonwithstanding culture, There are at to the lowest degree four aspects of human experience that regularly enter into gender ideologies. These allow work, appearance, sexuality and reproduction (Philips, 8). There is no denying the importance of the fact, that in the interactionist context, analyzed in this paper, such aspects as sexuality and appearance come into reckon in the early place. Based on these general theoretic considerations concerning gender ideologies let us analyze their reflection in concrete offices context of fend off, based on the empirical data self-collected in the field study.Gender Ideologies in gender interactions in exclude Fie ld research for this study was conducted in Dirtbags Bar and Grille in Tucson, AZ on June 1, 2009 during 1030-Midnight. The data collection orientation cogitate on observing how gender ideologies affect gender interactions in this situational context. The first observation includes objective bearingal patterns of men and women during their call down to bar. It was established as a fact, that men may arrive to bar both in 3-4 individuals roots and alone.Women, as the field study found never arrive alone, nonwithstanding only with their boyfriend of fe phallic friend. The latter situation may be interpreted through the prism of Butlers approach to gender identity construction. According to Buttler, identity is constructed based on repetition of certain styleal patterns, gestures, discourses etc (Butler, 519). The latter implies that social structures, existing in society already provide women with stable fashional orientations, taught to them by their families, older friends.O ne of such behavioral codes, which are immediately linked to gender ideology may be described as the cultural tabu for bring downing sport public places alone. Such taboo is connected first of all with transfer male perception of women, macrocosm alone in the bar or night club, as the invitation for sexual relations. Based on this perception, visiting bar alone for women automatically way moral fault, since she is immediately associated with prostitute etc. Unlike womens case, in mens gender ideology the problem of mans visiting bar alone does not exist, since it is not problematized as gender issue at all.Therefore, it is evident that men apply more behavioral options and may choose between them to ones own like. Buttler suggests that gender identities and ideologies are constructed through theatrical and performative interactions (Buttler, 520). The latter is particular evident in womens focus on their dress, plot visiting the bar. Women are more prone to put the emphasis o n their own vesture and comment on the apparels of their female friends. They oft make complements concerning good dress of each other.As the same time, men regularly have no tendency to comment on the clothes of their male friends. Instead, they often make complements to women concerning their dress. The latter observations show that gender ideology functions through performative and theatrical behavior reflected in the culture of dressing. manpower are relatively indifferent to what their friends wear, however, pay frequently attention to what women wear. The performative and theatrical role of gender ideologies is also evident in women and men behavior, when they enter the bar.Women express much more willingness to be noticed by public, including both men and women, as they immediately look for plurality they know. Unlike, women, men seem to be little tied by any social obligations as they often go straight to the bar and order drinks and only afterward this greet people they know. Moreover, a bar serves for men a spot to sit down, epoch women prefer staying near the bar and being attentive to what is going on around them. Gender ideological conventions concerning sexuality are also evident in the types of drinks ordered by men and women.First of all, male gender ideology is obvious in the wide-spread practice of ordering drinks by men for women, especially as the part of acquaintance or showing sexual interest. Such behavior is often welcomed by women, who are embedded in gender ideologies of men, because women are prone to interpret such attention as the marker of sympathy and often use it in their own interest. As far as the type of beverages, drunk by men and women are concerned, men usually do not differentiate between different drinks, while women often order low calorie beverages such as diet coke and Bacardi or sugar free redbull.The latter shows that the volume of women are embedded in the discourse relating to their appearance and sexua lity, which is according to Philips is one of the central aspects of gender ideology (Philips, 9). Women, embedded in gender ideology, get wind to follow its main conventions in any local context, including bar. Gender interactions in bar are also characterized by both and men and women behavior directed at emphasizing correspondingly their femininity and masculinity. Men in the conversation with women always try to lower the pitch of their voices, while women often raise it.As Tannen suggests, such strategies are inherently gender, because they are affected by existing ideological representations of femininity and masculinity (Tannen, 169). In these ideological representations masculinity is characterized by the low pitch of voice, which is associated with men authority and womens high pitch, associated with her secondary role in society. Gender socialization patterns in bar are also very informative, as far as the reflection of gender ideologies is concerned. Women tactile sensa tion more comfortable always being in union either of their female or male friends.In contrast, men may be either alone or in company without any differentiation. For women being in company guarantees the stability of her identity, because she may fully realize her performative and theatrical patterns of behavior. In contrast, being alone often causes negative gender connotations. Gender interactions in a bar are predominantly indoctrinated by men, when a member of a male crowd offers a drink to a woman or a base of women. Often women refuse such invitations, however, in a majority of cases they fit in level(p) if they feel compelled and uncomfortable in communicating with the large group of men.A man being alone, however, is little prone to initiate conversations with women, than if he finds himself in company. There is no denying the importance of the fact, that the discussed pattern of gender interactions in bar reflects certain features of dominant gender ideologies. As B utler suggests, gender interactions are regulated by social sanctions and taboos (Butler, 520). One of such taboos may be formulated as follows women are generally not in line to initiate gender interactions with men such priority solely belongs to the latter due to their primal role in gender relations.The realization of this taboo is particularly evident in bar context, where women generally behave in such a manner in order to stimulate mens interest, however, their own interests is hidden from public. A woman may be interested in communicating with a given man, however, due to certain gender limitations she is more likely to refuse from her ambitions. Moreover, men usually feel uncomfortable when gender interactions are initiated by women, because it is usually mocked up in his male company.Hence, it may be postulated that taboos and limitations relating to gender interactions exist both in male and female gender ideologies. If a woman and a man know each other they usually gre et by hugs, kisses and even if they are not engaged in romantic relations, they often show some chassis of flirting. In personal interactions between men and women gender ideologies are also evident in mens primary role in initiating tactile closeness with women, especially after alcohol drinks, including closeness, flirt, kisses, hugs, joking etc.Women, interested in such gender interactions, would not hesitate to communicate and flirt. However, a woman, who feels uncomfortable in this situation, according to the field study conducted, tries to use any possibility to escape from such kind of interactions. Gender ideologies are also embedded in the purpose of men and women visiting bars. Men usually visit bars to chase after women and find the object of their sexual desires etc. Women may also visit bars in this purpose, however, their clear intentions are not seen so evidently as that of men, hence, we may speak of dubious nature of their purpose.Such dispersal of gender roles clearly resonates with dominant gender ideology, according to which men have the priority in initiating close gender relations. As far as dancing practices in bars are concerned, men are less prone to dance alone however, women have no qualms about it. Men prefer dancing if they want to initiate interactions with women in such a case they dance close to her. Apart from this, gender interactions in bar are often characterized by age limitations. Older women rarely visit such kind of places however, older men may be seen there more frequently.Conclusion Gender ideologies represent language reflection of certain social and behavioral patterns of men and women and society. They usually refer to different social roles, types of discourse, sanctions and taboos and behavior of men and women. The analysis of gender ideologies in local context of bar showed that they are reflected in concrete interactions. Men and women usually act according to well-established gender conventions of behavio r, which are reflected in initiating interactions, purpose of bar visit, behavior in groups, intersexual behavior etc.Women seem to be good affected by their representation in men gender ideologies, which means that they have no behavioral choices. In contrast, mens behavior is characterized by the possibility of choice between a wide mold of options. Men may be either alone or with friends, initiate gender interactions or not etc. Women have virtually no choices they have refuse from initiating interactions, positively respond to any mens attempt to initiate communication, always be in a company etc.Moreover, gender interactions in bar reflect crucial social perceptions of women sexuality and appearance, which are the first aspect of gender coming into fly the coop in bar context. Women put emphasis on their appearance and clothes and often try to present their identity in performative and theatrical way, which according to Buttler, immediately links such kind of behavior to gen der strategies. In contrast men, pay less attention to such things and behave in a more casual and free way. Finally, mens behavior in a bar is regulated by the lesser number of social sanctions and taboos.References Blumer, Herbert (1969). Symbolic Interactionism Perspective and Method. Berkeley University of California Press. Butler, Judith. (1988). Performative Acts and Gender Constitution An try on in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal. Vol. 40 4, (519-531). Lakoff, Robin. Extract from quarrel and Womans Place. Philips, Susan U. (1999). Gender Ideology, Cross Cultural Aspects. International cyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford Elsevier Science Ltd. Tannen, Deborah. She is the Boss Women and Authority.