'Analytical Essay Super Size Me Essay\r'

'Welcome to At the Movies on ABC 1 and as frequent I’m your host, _______. Tonight we’ll be reviewing the soci totallyy critical 2004 infotainment, â€Å" crack surface Me” directed by and starring Morgan Spurlock. The rent documents the 30 solar day period in which Morgan Spurlock ate three meals a day consisting of nonhing but McDonalds whilst following these intravenous feeding rules: he can only obliterate things on sale, he must tops(predicate) size his meal if asked, he must eat e trulything on the calling card at least once and lastly he must restrict himself to the ‘average’ centre of exercise, typical of the the Statesn population. It besides documents the drastic personal effects this lifestyle has on Spurlock’s physical and psychological, wellbeing, and explores the dissipated solid forage constancy’s corporate influence, including how it encourages poor food for its own dinero. I frame this documental t o be quite enjoyable and it was an overall quality film. â€Å"Super Size Me” was playfulness to watch with its colourful graphics and dodgy lyrics which drew the auditory sense closer and center them on what Spurlock was representing.\r\nThe documental was effective in cr feeding shock and disgust deep down the auditory sense to further help the earreach summate with and have got Spurlock’s views. The narrative social structure of â€Å"Super Size Me” was built round a central enigma, this being the obesity crisis facing the the Statesn people. The documentary follows a format, showing the hearing Spurlock eating McDonalds food and and then sapiditying sick beca practise of it and then followed by footage of Spurlock seeing a specialist to inform both Spurlock and the listening of the some(prenominal) health risks this diet is inflicting on Spurlock. The documentary then proceeds to show such(prenominal) things as what check canteens be portion kids at school. This is meant to shock the audition and adjust them to consider what is happening to Spurlock and his health later eating spry food get out also happen to the kids who are eating unhealthy and processed meals at school every day. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) Spurlock’s purpose in this documentary was to inform and plaza the listening to encounter his views on America’s obesity epidemic.\r\nRead Also: analytical Essay Topics\r\nThis was achieved through cunning and intellectual choices as to what was filmed and what was cut out. He had also employed a depend of other techniques such as television camera angles, shot com pose, editing and intentional put on of music to accompany the visuals. Through these techniques Spurlock has effectively positioned the listening to choose his views on America’s aforementioned obesity epidemic. Spurlock has positioned the audience to try for a somewhat mutant of the truth as not all sides of the story are given a voice. The route in which Spurlock presents himself to the audience has also deliberately been altered to position the audience to coincide with the attitudes he’s presenting passim the documentary. Spurlock deliberately wore relaxed clothing and spoke flat to the audience in order to position the audience to feel comfortable evaluate Spurlock’s attitudes towards America’s obesity crisis. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE)\r\nTo further position and help the audience connect with Spulock, he has introduced them to his fiancé who’s a vegan chef which will be in juxtaposition to the unhealthy food served by some ready food restaurants. These inclusions have positioned the audience to feel close and trusting of Spurlock so that his opinions could be accepted. The subprogram of irony during this documentary has been utilise because if the audience finds something humorous and wherefore having a positive opposeion, they are more(preno minal) likely to accept what is being represented. The use of irony was used throughout the documentary in such scenes as when Spurlock was referring to his headaches, have a bun in the oven aches and general sick feeling from the food as McHeadaches and a McTummy. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE)This positions the audience to react in a way which enables them to accept the Spurlocks view on how McDonalds is affecting his health and how it’s making him generally sick.\r\nThe audience is positioned to accept reliable views without hearing or seeing the other sides of the argument. Spurlock has used bias by silencing or tarnishing the credibility of certain interviewees in interviews. When Spurlock interviews the CEO of McDonalds Australia, Guy Russo, the use of higher camera angles and editing positioned the audience to disagree and view what Guy Russo tell negatively which in turn has light-emitting diode to the audience viewing severely of McDonalds nonetheless though they were not completely silenced. Spurlock has also positioned the audience to accept the opinions and beliefs of the three health check specialists who are monitoring Spulock’s health throughout the ‘ audition’. The use of centre aim camera angles positions the audience to feel equal with the specialists as they present their opinions and to direct believe and accept what the specialists are dictum due to the camera angles and their superior level of education within the medical theater of operations which once again positions the audience to accept their attitudes.\r\nThe include footage has also been deliberately used to further position the audience to accept Spurlock’s views on America’s extravagant food industries and how their corporate profit is weighted over the health of their consumers. Footage of the many an(prenominal) advertisements and meals which are specifically positioned at kids were deliberately shown to position us to believe Mc Donalds is victimization these things to appeal to and lure the kids in. This then imparts in the audience being positioned to reflect seedy of McDonalds and their constant need of profits which are put over the wellbeing of their customers. patronage shots of Spurlock without a shirt have intentionally been included to show the weight he may or may not have gained as a result of his high fat intake diet. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) This positions the audience to once again think poorly of McDonalds and the food they are serving as they are seeing the drastic effects that accompany Spurlock’s heavy McDonalds diet. When the interviews betwixt Spurlock and the three health experts took place, key cost where placed on the screen so that they were imprinted into the viewer’s mind.\r\nThese key scathe included: â€Å"poor nutrition” and specially â€Å"Addiction” which led the audience to believe how fast food is affecting the health of Spurlock and to view the companies behind the food negatively without taking into consideration the amount of fast food he is eating and how much it’s being eaten. The music and soundtrack within this documentary often complements the visuals, making it easier for the audience to accept the visuals or the lyrics of the complementing soundtrack. During the opening menu of the documentary and closing credits the â€Å"Super Size Me” birdcall was played and the work of the menu reflected the colours of the American flag. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) This song was co-written by Spurlock and included phrases such as: â€Å"Super size me †the American way” and â€Å"everything’s bigger in America”.\r\nThese lyrics were intentionally used as they position the audience to accept that the American culture is the result of the American fast food industries influence on the American lodge whether it’s a positive or negative influence. Overall the documentary was very en joyable to watch and I found the footage rather shocking and attention grabbing at times. It was a very informative and mall opening documentary with a legion(predicate) number of techniques which position the audience to accept Spurlock’s views on America’s thirst for profits which have sadly resulted in the percentage of obese citizens ripening at an alarming rate.\r\nHowever, the use of the included techniques and selective editing resulted in a documentary which lacked objectivity. This lack of objectivity effected the audience’s perception of fast food companies and how they might consider an ersatz choice when deciding to dine at McDonalds or any other fast food ‘restaurant’. Overall I gave this documentary, 3 out of 5 stars as it was enjoyable to watch but at times I felt as if I was being positioned and the whole ‘experiment’ was over the top as person coming from eating healthy vegan foods is plain going to have a dramat ically negative reaction to fatty fast foods, which is skewing the audiences perception of fast food companies.\r\n'